Joseph S. Grinstein
Joe Grinstein is a partner at Susman Godfrey and has been with the firm since 1998. Grinstein has represented both plaintiffs and defendants in a wide variety of matters, including intellectual property, antitrust, securities, contract, class action, insurance coverage, ERISA, probate, mass tort, and bankruptcy cases.
Grinstein represents clients in litigation matters of all stripes, but recently much of his practice has focused on intellectual property disputes. Grinstein has handled or is handling patent/trade secret cases against such defendants as Intel, Dell, Microsoft, Apple, AMD, Sony, HTC, Verizon, AT&T, Motorola, TSMC, Xilinx, Samsung, LG, Nokia, Google, Yahoo!, Priceline, Orbitz, E*TRADE, and Netflix.
Grinstein received a B.A. from Rice University in 1994, where he graduated summa cum laude. He received his J.D. from Yale Law School in 1997. At Yale, Grinstein was Managing Editor of the Yale Law Journal, and he won the school's mock trial competition. His Journal note received the university-wide prize for best thesis relating to the humanities or religion. After graduating from Yale, Grinstein served as a law clerk to the Hon. Patrick E. Higginbotham of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Grinstein is a member of the American Bar Association, the Texas state bar, and the Houston Bar Association, where in 2006-07 he served as the Chair of the Antitrust and Trade Regulation Section. He is an active volunteer at Rice University, where he serves as the Chair of the Annual Fund (2010-12) and of the Rice Associates (2011-13).
Rice University (B.A., Summa Cum Laude, 1994)
Yale Law School (J.D., 1997)
Hon. Patrick E. Higginbotham of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
• Managing Editor, Yale Law Journal (1996-97)
• Chair, Houston Bar Association Antitrust & Trade Regulation Section (2006-07)
• In 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, and 2011 Texas Monthly and Texas Law and Politics magazines named Grinstein a "Rising Star" of the Texas legal profession. H Texas magazine named him a "Top Lawyer" in 2008, 2009, and 2010, a "Top Lawyer for the People" in 2009, a "Professional on the Fast Track" in 2005, and a "Lawyer on the Fast Track" in 2004.
• Benchmark Litigation's 2011 report named Grinstein a "future star" in Texas. Its 2010 report also named Grinstein a "future star" and commented that he is viewed as a "prominent complex commercial litigator." Its 2009 report noted that Grinstein "receives praise for an array of intellectual property matters."
- "Antitrust and Standard Setting", Eastern District of Texas/Federal Circuit Bench Bar Conference (September 26, 2011)
- "Litigating and Trying Complex Civil Antitrust Class Actions: Jury Instructions," American Bar Association Section of Antitrust Law Brown-Bag Tele-seminar (July 22, 2009)
- "E-Discovery and In re Weekley Homes," Harris County Civil Judiciary's 2009 Summer Continuing Judicial Education Seminar (August 4, 2009)
- "Exclusive Dealing, Loyalty Programs, and Bundling: The Plaintiff's Perspective," 2007 American Bar Association Antitrust Section Spring Meeting
- "The Front Lines: Prudent Business Decision-Making in Light of the New Realities of Distribution," 2006 Conference Board Antitrust Conference
- "Evaluating the Competitive Effects of Exclusive Dealing Agreements: The Plaintiffs' Perspective," American Bar Association Tele-seminar (June 24, 2005) (reprinted in The Antitrust Source (November 2005)
- "The Mythology of Aggregate Corporate Knowledge: A Deconstruction," 65 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 210 (1997) (with Thomas A. Hagemann)
- Note, "Jihad and the Constitution: The First Amendment Implications of Combating Religiously Motivated Terrorism," 105 Yale L.J. 1347 (1996)
- In May 2012, Grinstein – along with a team of lawyers from Susman Godfrey and co-counsel Heim, Payne & Chorush – obtained a $15.4 million verdict on behalf of his client, PACT XPP Technologies, AG, in federal court in Marshall, Texas. PACT alleged that Xilinx, Inc. and Avnet, Inc. had infringed two of PACT’s patents via their sale of certain Xilinx-branded Field Progammable Gate Array (FPGA) devices. The jury found that both PACT patents were infringed and valid, and it further determined Xilinx’s infringement to be willful. Grinstein was first chair at trial, handling PACT’s opening statement and closing argument, as well as presenting or cross-examining several key witnesses.
- In 2008 and 2009, Grinstein represented a group of more than forty health plans (who between them comprise more than 70% of the U.S. market for private health insurance) asserting healthcare reimbursement liens against claimants to the $4.85 billion Vioxx compensation fund. Grinstein handled all arguments for the health plans before the District Court and later the Fifth Circuit. In January 2009, Grinstein's clients reached a groundbreaking settlement with the Vioxx Plaintiffs' Steering Committee, guaranteeing them certain payouts on their liens covering participating plaintiffs. The American Lawyer magazine featured this settlement and mentioned Grinstein in the "Big Suits" column of its April 2009 issue.
- In February 2008, Grinstein scored two appellate wins for the same client, Nevada Gold & Casinos, in the space of just two weeks. First, following Grinstein's November 2007 appellate argument, the Texas Court of Appeals (First District) on February 7, 2008, affirmed the $8.3 million verdict that Grinstein and one other Susman Godfrey lawyer had obtained for Nevada Gold against American Heritage in April 2006. In an unrelated case for the same client, Grinstein and a team of Susman Godfrey lawyers obtained in January 2007 summary judgment against Rinaldo Corporation's tortious interference claims against Nevada Gold, in which Rinaldo was seeking more than $300 million. Grinstein argued the Rinaldo appeal on February 11, 2008, and, on February 15, 2008, the California Court of Appeals (Fifth District) affirmed the summary judgment order, absolving Nevada Gold of all alleged liability.
- In September 2007, Grinstein and a team of Susman Godfrey lawyers obtained a $30.5 million jury verdict on behalf of his client, UniRAM Technology, Inc., in a trade secrets case tried in federal court in San Francisco. After interest and costs, the trial court later entered judgment in favor of UniRAM for approximately $36 million. UniRAM alleged that defendant Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corp. (TSMC) had misappropriated UniRAM's trade secrets regarding specialized computer memory devices known as embedded DRAM. Among other things, Grinstein handled both sides' damages witnesses at trial, and he cross-examined TSMC's principal technical expert. News of the verdict was reported widely in both the U.S. and Taiwan. Verdict Search listed the verdict as one of the top 100 plaintiff's verdicts nationally in 2007, and the Los Angeles Daily Journal pegged it as one of the top 10 plaintiff's verdicts in California in 2007. The case settled on confidential terms while on appeal.
- In April 2006, Grinstein and one other Susman Godfrey lawyer represented Nevada Gold & Casinos in a breach-of-contract trial relating to the development of a Native American casino in New Mexico. Following a three-week trial in Houston, the jury returned a verdict awarding Nevada Gold essentially all of the damages it claimed. In October 2006, after extensive post-trial briefing, the trial court entered judgment in favor of Nevada Gold and against the defendant, American Heritage, Inc., for over $9 million.
- In 2004 and 2005, Grinstein and a team of Susman Godfrey lawyers represented MicroUnity Systems Engineering, Inc. in its patent infringement lawsuit against Intel, Corporation and Dell, Inc. MicroUnity alleged that Intel's Pentium III, Pentium 4, and Pentium M processors, and Dell's use of those processors, infringed several MicroUnity patents covering "mediaprocessor" technology. Grinstein was involved in all aspects of the case, including arguing the Markman hearing. In October 2005, one month before trial was to commence, the parties reached a confidential settlement of the case, the financial terms of which Intel disclosed in its Third Quarter 2005 10-Q. Articles discussing the importance of the case and the magnitude of the settlement appeared in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the San Francisco Chronicle, the San Jose Mercury News, and various high-tech websites.
- In 2003 and 2004, Grinstein and several additional Susman Godfrey lawyers tried two bankruptcy plan confirmation hearings — In re The Babcock & Wilcox Company (three weeks of trial time) and In re Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (one week of trial time) --- representing the interests of Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London and Certain London Market Companies. Grinstein's clients settled the Babcock & Wilcox dispute, while Pittsburgh Corning eventually withdrew the bankruptcy plan to which his clients objected.
- In 2003, Grinstein won an appeal he briefed and argued to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit regarding the scope of ERISA plans' subrogation and reimbursement rights. The Fifth Circuit's opinion was the subject of a front-page article in the December 29, 2003, issue of The Texas Lawyer, in which Grinstein was quoted and pictured.
- In 2003, Grinstein tried with one additional Susman Godfrey lawyer an arbitration involving claims against Service Corporation International under the Texas Securities Act. Grinstein's clients, James P. Hunter, III, and the James P. Hunter, III, Family Partnership Limited, won the arbitration and were awarded $27.8 million by the panel of arbitrators.
- In 2002, Grinstein tried with two additional Susman Godfrey lawyers an arbitration claim brought by his client, Lyondell Chemical Co., against Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO), involving the sale of MTBE. The arbitrator granted most of Lyondell's claims against ARCO, and as a result ARCO agreed to pay Grinstein's client an eight-figure net settlement.
- In 2001, Grinstein obtained class certification from the Middle District of Florida for a class of African-American employees of Western Auto Supply Co. (now owned by Advance Stores Company, Inc.) who were suing the former auto parts retailer for racial discrimination. The defendants immediately appealed the certification decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Grinstein briefed and argued the appeal, and the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the class certification decision — the first such class action the Eleventh Circuit had upheld in decades. The case settled in 2003, with the defendants making a substantial payment to the class.
American Bar Association, Texas state bar, and the Houston Bar Association.