Trey Peacock
Houston Office Phone: (713) 653-7808 Email Download vCard Print Bio to PDF
  • The University of Texas School of Law, Juris Doctor (J.D.) with Honors
    • Order of the Coif, Managing Editor of Texas Law Review, Chancellors
  • Princeton University, Bachelor of Arts in American History with Honors
Judicial Clerkship
  • Judicial Clerk to the Honorable Joseph T. Sneed, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco (1990-1991)

For over twenty-five years, Trey Peacock has won cases based on science and data, successfully representing companies and individuals in complex business disputes.  He has been lead trial counsel for plaintiffs and defendants in state and federal courts in twenty states, including California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Texas, and Washington.

Clients seek out Trey for his unique comfort level with highly technical, data-driven matters, including damages.  His successes span technical areas as varied as offshore rig construction (in an international arbitration); convoluted title histories for thousands of oil and gas leases (in an energy lawsuit in state court); the underpinnings of random number generation (in a series of patent cases); the sciences of toxicology, epidemiology, and environmental exposure (in state and federal toxic tort matters); and the use of environmental air modeling (in a variety of cases, including a plaintiffs’ class action for environmental property damage).  Whether a favorable result depends upon the proper calculation of damages or the application of advanced scientific theories, Trey is a quick study and an effective advocate.

Trey’s peers have recognized him repeatedly as a one of the Best Lawyers in America and as a Texas Super Lawyer.  A native of Beaumont, Texas, he graduated with Honors from Princeton University and from University of Texas School of Law, where he was Managing Editor of the Texas Law Review, Order of the Coif, and a Chancellor.  After law school, Trey clerked for the Honorable Joseph T. Sneed on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, California.

Trey has served on the Alley Theatre’s Board of Directors for over a decade.  For ten years, he was also Team Captain for the Firm’s BP MS150 cycling team; under his leadership, the team raised more than $1 Million to fight multiple sclerosis.  In his spare time, Trey is an avid fly fisherman and snow boarder and participates in triathlons.

Honors and Distinctions
  • Texas Super Lawyer (2009-Present),by Thomson Reuters' Super Lawyers
  • Ranked in The Best Lawyers in America for Commercial Litigation in Houston (Woodward White Inc.,  2014 - 2017)
Professional Associations and Memberships
  • Alley Theatre: Board of Directors (since 2005), Executive Committee, Special Events Committee, previous Chair of the Alley Theatre Ball
  • Houston Bar Association Antitrust Section: Former Section Chair
  • MS150 Team Captain: Raised over $1 Million as Susman Godfrey MS150 Team Captain (2005-2015)
Notable Representations
  • It's one thing for a plaintiff to wave the white flag on the courthouse steps; it's quite another thing for it to happen in the courtroom itself with a jury panel waiting in the hallway. That's precisely what Peacock and Shawn Raymond achieved for their client Oaktree Capital Management, one of the premier private equity firms in the United States.  The investment banker plaintiff had sought $7+ million in damages for alleged fraud and breach of fiduciary duty.  As potential jurors were about to enter the courtroom, Peacock and Raymond won a dismissal with prejudice of all claims against Oaktree.
  • Jim Ford, a Managing Director at Oaktree, called the result a "great outcome" and noted, "We were confident that the jury would find in our favor, but thanks to Trey's and Shawn's hard work and legal skills, we never had to find out. We were completely vindicated and able to avoid the cost and uncertainty inherent in any jury trial. We couldn't be happier with their representation."  Immediately after the plaintiff dismissed all claims against Oaktree, the remaining defendant hired Trey and Shawn to help its current lawyers try the case.
  • As lead trial counsel for Quantum World Corporation, Peacock successfully litigated and settled a series of patent infringement cases against computer and chip manufacturers in which Quantum World alleged infringement of its patents for true random number generators.  These cases were prosecuted in both the Eastern and Western Districts of Texas and resulted in several, very favorable confidential settlements for Peacock’s client.
  • As lead counsel in an international arbitration, Peacock successfully defended ABB Lummus Global, Inc. and its joint venture partner in a multi-million dollar dispute related to their construction of a $700 million offshore oil and gas platform.  The case was arbitrated before a three-member panel pursuant to UNCITRAL rules.  Peacock fully prevailed, achieving rejection of all the Plaintiff's claims and obtaining a full award of attorneys' fees and costs for his client.
  • Peacock successfully represented the largest individual shareholder in the historic King Ranch in a dispute over the value of his interest in the Ranch and its business operations.
  • Peacock served as lead class counsel for a group of African-American former employees at Western Auto who brought suit for discrimination under Title VII.  After prevailing on the appeal of class certification to the 11th Circuit, Peacock achieved a substantial settlement for his clients.
  • Peacock represented KBR in its defense, trial, and appeal of a series of lawsuits brought by former national guardsmen regarding their alleged exposure to sodium dichromate during their service in the Iraq War.  Peacock led the scientific side of the case, ultimately winning dismissal in federal district court largely based on scientific evidence he elicited during depositions of Plaintiffs’ expert.  The Court relied upon that evidence to conclude that Plaintiffs’ claims lacked the required level of scientific causation.