|

|
|
Barnett's
Notes
On Commercial
Litigation |
Volume III, Issue
4 April 2007 | |
|

|
|
Subscribe
to blawgletter.com
In This Issue
|
|
1. Sisyphus, Catch-22, and The Walk of
Life. Analogize this,
buddy.
2. Did You
Know? We got awards.
3. Misunderestimating
Opponents. Doncha do
it.
4. Cappin'
Crunch. What hath Boomer
wrought?
5. Roundup. Links
to favorite Blawgletter
posts.
6. Hot
Lunch. We help stop pollution. For free. In Texas!
7. Biosphere
3. Cartoon.
| |
|

Cap'n Horatio
Magellan Crunch. Your Editor has enjoyed the Guppy
commander's cereal since before 1970.
Cappin' Crunch
Remember the fun we had in
first-year Torts withBoomer v. Atlantic Cement
Co. --
the 1970 New York Court of Appeals decision
that shocked environmentalists when it refused to
enjoin a cement plant from spewing dirt and smoke onto
neighboring land? Recall that the Court instead
ordered Atlantic Cement to pay "permanent damages" to
Oscar Boomer and other property owners? And that
the Court thus (according to the
dissent) "licens[ed] a continuing
wrong"?
Your Editor didn't either -- until a pro
bono case (see Hot Lunch
below) heightened debate over mandatory
reductions of greenhouse gas emissions and a
"cap-and-trade" regime. The controversy, Your
Editor imagines, echoes the economic issues in
Boomer . Pollution inflicts economic harm
on people whom it sickens, whose property it devalues,
and whose environment it degrades. The polluter
usually doesn't bear these costs, and neither do the
buyers of its products. The market thus fails
to reflect the full cost of making the goods
or services into their price.
A tax on greenhouse gases aims to
correct the market failure. If a
company pollutes a lot, it pays a lot. If it chooses cleaner production methods, it
pays less.
Cap-and-trade describes one way to
internalize pollution costs. The method caps the
amount of greenhouse gases that a producer can
generate but also allows it to buy credits that permit
it to exceed the cap. The producer gets the
credits from a producer whose emissions fall below the
cap.
And it all started with
Boomer. Sort of.
Subscribe to a free Blawgletter
feed. |
|

Hot Lunch
Susman Godfrey recently concluded its pro bono representation
of a coalition of Texas cities that opposed the
efforts of utility giant TXU to build
eight coal-burning plants using old
technology. The coalition successfully intervened
in administrative proceedings on TXU's permit
applications and presented evidence supporting cleaner
technology. TXU withdrew the applications after
announcing a private equity buyout and a new
environmental direction, including advocacy for a tax on
greenhouse gases. See press releases here and here.
By the way, in the same year that
Boomer came down (see Cappin'
Crunch above), TXU threw the switch on a
cleaner natural gas burning plant. Its
now-prophetic name? Tradinghouse.
What the
hey -- Blawgletter
|
|
|
Sisyphus,
Catch-22, and The Walk of Life
 Capt. Yossarian (Alan Arkin) has an
arboreal discussion with 1st Lt. Milo Minderbinder (Jon
Voight) in Catch-22
(1970).
Mythical Sisyphus rolls a boulder up an
incline. An instant before the rock
reaches the top, his strength fails him, and the
boulder comes back down. So he pushes it
again. And down it goes. Up and down,
over and over.
In Catch-22, the novel
by Joseph Heller, B-25 bombardier John Yossarian claims insanity
as a way to get out of suicidal raids during World War
II. The military refuses to discharge
him, reasoning that anyone who
claims craziness couldn't possibly suffer from
it. Catch-22.
And rock band Dire Straits celebrates Johnny
Mathis with The Walk of Life
(1986). You remember: "He got the
action, he got the motion/Yeah, the boy can
play/Dedication, devotion/Turning all the night time
into the day/And after all the violence and double
talk/There's just a song in the trouble and the
strife/You do the walk, you do the walk of life."
What do these three vignettes have in
common aside from the fact that Your Editor likes
them? More to the point, how do they concern
business trial law? Truth to tell, they don't
-- unless you agree with Socrates about the
persuasive power of analogy.
An analogy draws a comparison -- a brief
and imprecise one -- to connect with the
listener's experiences. For example:
-
The crazier Yossarian acted, the saner the
Army considered him. Your client may
have wandered into a no-win situation,
too. Catch-22, man.
Don't worry about seeming precious, silly, or
twee. You will. But do make sure that you
believe that the analogy fits. Conviction will
carry you. As it did Socrates.

Barry Barnett, Editor
Go to Blawgletter -- another
find product of Your Editor. |
|
Back to
top |
|
Misunderestimating
Opponents
 Lucius
Aemelius Paulus and Gaius Terentius Varro
misunderestimated Hannibal at Cannae (216 B.C.). Having crossed the Alps with hephalumps, Hannibal's
50,000 encircled and routed 80,000 Romans.
Speaking of strange people, a high
school football coach relished reassuring our team about
the upcoming powerhouse opponent with quips like "they
may be strong, but they're fast", "they may be quick,
but they're smart", and "they may have won all their
games, but we haven't". He also spelled "helmet"
with an "n" before the "t". We called him "Blob" (after a character who
tried to steal Super Sugar Crisp from Sugar
Bear).
At least coach didn't minimize the
worthiness of our opponents, and he discouraged us
from doing so. For that, Blob, I sincerely thank
you.
But does Blob really deserve credit for promoting
caution and doubt? Did lowering expectations
actually help? Should Blob have learned to
spell better?
Your Editor will not hazard answers to
these eternal questions. But he will remind gentle
readers of a saying of the Buddha: "Existence
is suffering, and the cause of suffering is
desire." As trial lawyers, we desire to win. We suffer slings and arrows that our adversaries
throw. And in the midst of fighting we may even
come to disrespect the other side.
Huge mistake. Consider, from
childhood, the story of the hare and the
tortoise. Or David vs. Goliath. The Miracle
on Ice. Braveheart. The invincible Spanish
Armada. Hannibal at Cannae. Think about how
people gravitate to the underdog. Visualize how
arrogance alienates them.
Trial
lawyers with abundant personal regard --
i.e., all of them -- tend to underestimate their
opponents or overestimate themselves. But the best
ones have two key traits: (1) the intellect to
adapt to surprises and (2) the courage to
follow what Carl von Clausewitz's On War (1832) calls the
"faint light" that intellect produces. Smart
savages.
"War is the province of chance", says Clausewitz . Don't
worsen the odds by misunderestimating your
opponents. And strap on that
helment!
Curious about
Blawgletter? Lookie here. Or just go to
blawgletter.com. |
|
Back to
top |
|
|
Barry Barnett, Editor 901
Main Street, Suite 5100 Dallas, Texas 75202 Phone:
214-754-1903
Copyright © 2007 SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P Attorneys
at Law. All rights reserved.
For past issues of Barnett's
Notes on Commercial Litigation, please visit the
archive page. To
subscribe, send an email to notes@susmangodfrey.com with
"Subscribe" in the subject line.
If you don't want to receive
future issues of Barnett's Notes, please reply to
this email with "unsubscribe" in the subject line.
Barnett's Notes on Commercial
Litigation is for
informational purposes only and is not intended to provide
legal advice.
Transmission is not intended to
create and receipt does not establish an attorney-client
relationship.
**Privacy Policy: Quite
simply - We will never share your email information with any
other entity for any reason.
** | | |