Overview
Tom Boardman is a leading antitrust attorney with more than fifteen years of high-stakes litigation experience. His practice focuses on complex antitrust and commercial disputes, with experience at every stage of litigation, including trial and appeal.
His current representations reflect the breadth of his practice. In Index Exchange and Kargo v. Google, Tom represents two leading advertising technology companies in antitrust litigation alleging that Google unlawfully monopolized the market for open-web display ad exchanges through unlawful tying, auction manipulation, and other exclusionary practices designed to suppress rival exchanges. In Chegg v. Google, Tom represents the online educational publisher in vanguard antitrust litigation alleging that Google unlawfully maintained and exploited its monopoly in general search services by appropriating educational publisher content supplied for search indexing to operate AI-generated search-result overviews and other non-search features. In In re MultiPlan Health Insurance Provider Litigation, Tom was appointed one of the lead counsel attorneys to represent a proposed class of healthcare providers alleging that MultiPlan and insurance companies fixed reimbursement rates for out-of-network services. In Bausch & Lomb v. Gemini Insurance Co. et al., Tom represents Bausch + Lomb in a Louisiana state-court action against a tower of insurers for breach of contract and bad-faith denial of coverage under representations-and-warranties insurance policies issued in connection with an acquisition.
Over his career, Tom has played key roles in some of the country’s most significant antitrust cases. He served as a member of co-lead counsel for consumer and institutional-investor classes in litigation involving alleged price fixing in the contact-lens, government-sponsored bond, and foreign-exchange markets. His work has included taking and defending executive-level and expert depositions, leading discovery negotiations, presenting discovery disputes to courts, briefing and arguing summary judgment, developing damages theories with expert economists, and serving as the principal author of appellate briefs. Early in his career, Tom was part of the trial team that secured a favorable jury verdict in In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation and worked on landmark challenges to NCAA restrictions, including preparing prominent former athletes like Bill Russell and Oscar Robertson for depositions and helping develop the complaint and economic theory in Alston v. NCAA.
Tom also has substantial trial and broader complex-litigation experience. As a member of the trial team representing the City of Baltimore in litigation against pharmaceutical opioid manufacturers and distributors, he helped secure over $400 million in settlements and a unanimous $266 million jury verdict against the two remaining defendants. At trial, he presented an expert economist and prepared City witnesses and experts to testify; during discovery, he took depositions of defense medical experts and had primary responsibility for preparing and defending City witness depositions. Tom has also represented a multinational healthcare company in litigation concerning the alleged health effects of a chemical used to sterilize medical instruments, working closely with company personnel and counsel on document and data preservation and leading third-party discovery efforts.
Before joining Susman Godfrey, Tom was a partner at Scott+Scott and began his legal career clerking for Judge Christina Reiss of the U.S. District Court in his home state of Vermont. Tom earned his J.D. from the University of California College of the Law, San Francisco, where he served on the Hastings Science and Technology Law Journal and worked as a research assistant to Prof. Geoffrey Hazard, Jr. He received his B.A. from Vassar College. Tom is admitted to practice in New York and California, as well as before the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Second and Ninth Circuits and federal district courts in both states. His accomplishments have been recognized by the American Antitrust Institute, Best Lawyers, Super Lawyers, and Consumer Attorneys of California. He has also volunteered with the Florida Rights Restoration Coalition, working directly with formerly incarcerated citizens seeking restoration of their voting rights. In his free time, Tom enjoys running in the streets and parks of New York City and is a founding member of the Glue Factory Track Club.
Notable Representations
- City of Baltimore v. Purdue Pharma et al., where Tom represented the City of Baltimore in litigation and trial against opioid manufacturers and distributors. Susman Godfrey secured more than $400 million for the City in pre-trial settlements and obtained a $266 million jury verdict following a three-month trial against the remaining two defendants.
- Spore v. Baxter Healthcare Corp. (W.D. Ark.). Defense counsel for a multinational healthcare company in litigation regarding the alleged health effects of a chemical used for sterilizing medical instruments.
- In re Foreign Exchange Benchmark Rates Antitrust Litig., (S.D.N.Y.)
- In re GSE Bonds Antitrust Litig., (S.D.N.Y.)
- In re Disposable Contact Lens Antitrust Litig., (M.D. Fla.)
- Alaska Electrical Pension Fund v. Bank of America Corp. (“ISDAfix”), (S.D.N.Y)
- In re Bank of Nova Scotia Spoofing Litig., (D. N.J.)
- In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litig., (N.D. Cal.)
- In re Potash Antitrust Litig. (II), (N.D. Ill.)
- In re NCAA Athletic Grant-In-Aid Cap Antitrust Litig. (N.D. Cal.)
- In re NCAA Student-Athlete Name & Likeness Litig. (N.D. Cal.)
- Tom has also represented numerous businesses in bet-the-company arbitrations concerning acquisitions, financing gone sideways, disputes over earnout provisions, and general corporate governance.
- Index Exchange and Kargo v. Google, where Tom represents leading advertising technology companies Index Exchange and Kargo in antitrust litigation alleging that Google unlawfully monopolized the market for open-web display ad exchanges by using unlawful tying, auction manipulation, and other exclusionary practices to suppress rival exchanges.
- Chegg v. Google, where Tom and his colleagues represent Chegg, an online educational publisher, in its vanguard antitrust litigation asserting that Google has unlawfully maintained and exploited its monopoly in general search services to appropriate educational publisher content supplied for search indexing to operate AI generated search result overviews and other non-search features.
- In re MultiPlan Health Insurance Provider Litig., where Tom was named one of the lead counsel attorneys along with colleagues from Susman Godfrey and two other firms. The litigation concerns allegations by a class of healthcare providers regarding price fixing of out of network benefits by insurance companies and MultiPlan.
- Bausch & Lomb v. Gemini Insurance Co. et al., where Tom represents Bausch + Lomb in a Louisiana state-court action against a tower of insurers for breach of contract and bad-faith denial of coverage under representations-and-warranties policies issued in connection with an acquisition.
- In re Telescopes Antitrust Litig., where, along with two other co-lead firms, Susman Godfrey represents a class of consumers alleging anticompetitive conduct in the telescope market.
Honors & Distinctions
Honors and Awards
- One to Watch, Commercial Litigation Best Lawyers (2026 Woodward White, Inc.)
- American Antitrust Institute’s Outstanding Antitrust Litigation Achievement in Private Law Practice (2020) - In re GSE Bonds Antitrust Litig.
- American Antitrust Institute’s Outstanding Antitrust Litigation Achievement in Private Law Practice (2018) Alaska Electrical Pension Fund v. Bank of America et al. (ISDAfix Antitrust Litigation)
- Consumer Attorneys of California, Finalist for Consumer Attorney of the Year (2013) - In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litig.
- New York Metro Super Lawyer (2024, 2025)
- New York Metro Super Lawyer Rising Stars: Antitrust (2015 – 2020)
- New York Metro Super Lawyer: Antitrust (2020 – present)
Clerkships
- Honorable Christina Reiss, United States District Court for the District of Vermont
Education
Education
- University of California College of the Law, San Francisco (J.D.)
- Member, Science and Technology Law Journal
- Research Assistant to Prof. Geoffrey C. Hazard, Jr.
- Vassar College
Admissions
Admissions
Bar Admissions
- California
- New York
Court Admissions
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
- U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
- U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Publications
- Reverse Engineering Your Antitrust Case: Plan for Trial Even Before You File Your Case,Antitrust Magazine, Spring 2014, Vol. 28, No. 2, with Bruce L. Simon.
- Class Action for Health Professionals, chapter from Advocacy Strategies for Health and Mental Health Professionals,Springer Publishing Co., 2011, with Bruce L. Simon and Stuart L. Lustig, Editor.
Leadership & Professional Memberships
Associations
- ABA Antitrust Section
