Ian B. Crosby
Partner
Seattle Office Phone: (206) 516-3861 Email Download vCard Print Bio to PDF
Education
  • University of Texas School of Law (J.D., high honors, 1998).
    • Order of the Coif and Society of Chancellors Articles Editor, Texas Law Review
    • Norman S. Davis, Clarence Leon Carter, and Locke Purnell Rain Harrell Endowed Presidential Scholarships in Law
    • Awards for highest achievement in several subjects, including Patent Litigation and Antitrust
  • Reed College (B.A., faculty commendation, 1995)
  • Goethe Institut, Bremen, Germany (Certificate of German as a Foreign Language, 1989)
Judicial Clerkship

Law clerk to the Honorable Robert Boochever, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1999-2000

Law clerk to the Honorable John C. Coughenour, United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, 1998-1999

Ian B. Crosby
Partner

Ian Crosby has received national recognition from U.S. News – The Best Lawyers in America®, the American Intellectual Property Law Association, and Managing IP Magazine for his work and expertise in the field of intellectual property litigation and licensing. He has tried and litigated patent, copyright, antitrust, and other complex commercial cases in federal courts throughout the country. He has also represented parties before the U.S. International Trade Commission, in private arbitrations, and in confidential licensing negotiations.

Notable Results

Uniloc U.S.A. v. Bitdefender LLC, Case No. 2:16-cv-00394-RWS (N.D. Cal. 2017): Complete summary judgment in favor of client Bitdefender LLC on grounds that asserted software distribution patents were invalid for claiming ineligible subject matter.

VHT, Inc. v. Zillow Group, Inc., Case No. 2:15-cv-01096-JLR (W.D. Wa. 2017): Judgment entered for client Zillow on over 95% of claims for infringement of copyrighted images.

In the Matter of Certain Wearable Activity Tracking Devices, Investigation No. 337-TA-973 (I.T.C. 2016): Complaint against client Jawbone withdrawn after finding that asserted fitness tracking patents were invalid for claiming ineligible subject matter.

In Re Queen’s University at Kingston, No. 2015-145 (Fed. Cir. 2016): Grant of mandamus petition for client Queen’s University at Kingston established the application of the attorney-client privilege to prosecution-related communications with registered patent agents.

Two-Way Media LLC v. AT&T et al., No. 2014-1302 (Fed. Cir. 2015): Affirmed $40 million judgment obtained at trial for client Two-Way Media LLC for infringement of streaming content delivery patents by AT&T.

ViaSat, Inc. v. Space Systems/Loral, Inc. et al., No. 3:12-cv-00260-H (S.D. Cal. 2014): Vacated award of damages against client Space Systems/Loral for alleged infringement of satellite communications patents.

DDR Holdings, LLC v. Hotels.com, L.P. et al., No. 2013-1505 (Fed. Cir. 2014): Opinion affirming in part trial judgment obtained for client DDR Holdings was first, and, for eighteen months, only Federal Circuit decision to uphold the validity of a computer software patent on subject matter grounds after the Supreme Court’s decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int’l, 134 S. Ct. 2347 (2014).

Native American Marketing and Development Corp. v. Arctic Slope Regional Corporation et al., No. 8:07-cv-02436 (D. Md. 2009): Complete summary judgment for client Arctic Slope Regional Corporation in a suit seeking a hundred-million dollar finder’s fee on the largest single-source government contract in history.

Novell, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp. (2004): Settlement of antitrust claims for client Novell in a confidential amount that the New York Times later reported to be $536 million.

Pro Bono

Pro Bono Partner, Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun

ViolenceDaniels et al. v. Armslist et al., Appeal NO. 2017AP344 (Wisc. Ct. App. 2018): Prepared amicus brief on behalf of IBM computer scientist Dr. Yaser Doleh at the invitation of the Brady Campaign in support of successful appeal establishing that the Communications Decency Act did not shield online service provider from liability for features of its web site alleged to encourage illegal gun sales.

Praise from Clients and Experts

“Ian Crosby … is smart, capable, and a first-rate lawyer, able to understand and master difficult and complex areas of technology.”

—Avi Katz, President, General Counsel & Secretary, Loral Space and Communications, Inc.

“Ian delivered a powerful opening statement and followed it with incredible cross examination of the defendant witnesses that totally destroyed their case.”

—Daniel Ross, Owner, DDR Holdings, LLC

“If MIT granted honorary degrees, I would nominate you for one.”

—Dr. Joel Schindall, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

“You’re the smartest lawyer I’ve ever met.”

—Dr. Paul Min, Washington University

Please see additional endorsements on LinkedIn.

Honors and Distinctions
  • Recognized by U.S. News – The Best Lawyers in America® (2018- 2020 Woodward White Inc.) for Intellectual Property Litigation and Patent Litigation in Seattle.
  • Invited speaker on patent licensing, 2018 American Intellectual Property Association Spring Meeting.
  • Recipient of the 2017 Editor’s Choice Award from Managing IP (Euromoney Legal Media Group) for work on In re: Queen’s University at Kingston et al.
  • Master of the Bench, Seattle IP Inn of Court
  • Washington Law & Politics Magazine (Thomson Reuters) “Rising Star” from 2003 to 2009.
References

Brad Owens, General Counsel, Zillow Group—Seattle, Washington
— brado@zillow.com

Avi Katz, President, General Counsel, & Secretary, Loral Space & Communications, Inc.— New York, New York
— akatz@hq.loral.com

Daniel Ross, Owner, DDR Holdings, LLC—Dunwoody, Georgia
— ddross@bellsouth.net