Tamar Lusztig
Partner
New York Office Phone: (212) 729-2007 Email Download vCard Print Bio to PDF
Education
  • Columbia Law School (J.D.)
  • University of Massachusetts, Amherst (B.A.)
Judicial Clerkship

Law Clerk to the Honorable Louis L. Stanton, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York

Tamar Lusztig
Partner

Tamar Lusztig represents plaintiffs and defendants at trial and on appeal in federal and state courts across the country. Tamar is a seasoned trial lawyer with substantial courtroom experience, representing her clients in a wide variety of matters regarding intellectual property, antitrust, contracts, employment, products liability, and other high-stakes, complex cases.

Tamar has amassed an impressive docket of high-profile cases, often facing off – and prevailing – against opponents with substantially more resources than her clients. Tamar’s clients and colleagues look to her for her strategic acumen, judgment, and composure under pressure to help secure victory in bet-the-company cases.

Recent Successes
  • Tamar represents New York University in a lawsuit brought by FASORP, a Texas organization that claims the university discriminates against white men in its efforts to foster diversity in its faculty and on the NYU Law Review. Tamar briefed and won her client’s motion to dismiss before the district court, and briefed, argued and won the appeal before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. You can read the Second Circuit’s precedential decision here, listen to Tamar’s winning argument here, and read more about the case here, here, here, here, and here.
  • Tamar is currently prosecuting multiple class actions for victims of child pornography in groundbreaking lawsuits against PornHub, its parent company MindGeek, and Reddit. The cases allege that the defendants have violated federal and state sex trafficking laws by knowingly disseminating and profiting from thousands of pornographic videos and images featuring minors. PornHub’s efforts to escape the case against it was recently rejected by a California federal judge.
  • Tamar represents a putative class of municipalities in an antitrust dispute brought against numerous major banks related to their price-fixing of bond rates.
  • Tamar represents the University of Massachusetts and Carmel Laboratories in a patent infringement case against cosmetics giant L’Oréal. Tamar briefed, argued, and won a case-dispositive claim construction motion for her clients.
  • Tamar achieved victory for a research hospital in a confidential AAA arbitration with a major international pharmaceutical company regarding a patent licensing dispute. Tamar cross examined each fact witness her adversary presented, obtaining testimony the Tribunal relied on heavily in its decision securing Tamar’s client a multi-million-dollar award.
  • Tamar successfully prosecuted a patent infringement case against AT&T over pioneering Internet technology invented by Tamar’s client. Tamar briefed, argued, and won multiple motions, including a critical claim construction motion in which the Court adopted all of her client’s positions. This case settled on favorable, confidential terms soon afterwards.
  • Tamar represented PMC, the owner of one of the world’s most valuable patent portfolios, in a week-long jury trial against Google. Tamar briefed, argued, and won numerous critical pre-trial motions. At trial, Tamar put on the 4-hour direct exam of her client’s primary liability expert, as well as cross examining Google engineers.
  • Tamar represented an insurance company in a confidential nine-figure dispute with one of its insureds about the scope of coverage. The case settled on confidential terms shortly before a scheduled AAA arbitration.
  • Tamar represented a former prisoner in a Section 1983 case arising out of an illegal strip search during her incarceration. Key admissions Tamar obtained in the defendants’ depositions led to a sizeable settlement for her client on the eve of trial.

Tamar is the first woman to be elected to the Susman Godfrey partnership in New York,* and chair of the firm’s Diversity Committee.

 

*Along with another woman, elected at the same time. 

Honors and Distinctions

James Kent Scholar

Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar

Editor-in-Chief, Columbia Journal of Tax Law

Publications

Deducting the Cost of Sex Reassignment Surgery: How O’Donnabhain v. Commissioner Can Help Us Make Sense of the Medical Expense Deduction, 3 Colum. J. Tax L. 86 (2012)

Professional Associations and Memberships

State of New York

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas