- Northwestern University (B.A., Political Science and Communication Studies, magna cum laude)
- UCLA School of Law (J.D.)
Law clerk to the Honorable Philip S. Gutierrez, United States District Court for the Central District of California
Krysta Pachman represents plaintiffs and defendants in high-stakes commercial litigation, including class actions, patent cases, copyright matters, and other disputes. Pachman has a track record of obtaining trial wins, favorable settlements and arbitration victories for her appreciative clients:
Krysta absorbed a lot of technical information, digested it, and helped the team understand the challenges with our case. [She] developed and recommended strategies, and stood [her] ground when the other side and their expert tried to bully [her]. Krysta’s professionalism and skill was essential to the outcome we received from the panel.
-Denise M. Buffington, Director, Federal Regulatory Affairs and Corporate Counsel, Kansas City Power & Light Company
Recently, Pachman represented Kansas City Power & Light Company, where she was an essential part of an arbitration team on a renewable energy litigation matter. She delivered the opening statement, cross-examined the other side’s expert, presented fact and expert witnesses, handled depositions, managed expert reports, and wrote the pre-and post-hearing briefs. The panel unanimously ruled in her client’s favor.
In the widely covered Ferrick, et al. v. Spotify USA, Pachman was an integral part of a trial team that secured a $43.45 million cash settlement fund and an agreement to pay future royalties to settle a class-action lawsuit with Spotify brought on behalf of music copyright owners (fees and expenses not yet determined). The settlement is subject to court approval. This case made national news, receiving press from Billboard, Forbes, and Reuters.
Earlier in her career, Pachman played a key role in Schulein, et al. v. Petroleum Development Corp., representing a class of more than 7,000 limited partners who invested in 12 oil and gas limited partnerships, who alleged the defendants made false and misleading statements and omitted material information regarding the value of the assets held by the partnerships in proxy statements used to solicit votes in favor of mergers that caused the investors to be cashed out of their investments. Pachman took key depositions, wrote the opposition to defendants’ motion for summary judgment, and wrote the successful opposition to defendants’ motion to decertify the class. The case was settled for $37.5 million in March 2015, with the class receiving approximately $24 million.
Prior to joining Susman Godfrey, Pachman served as a Law Clerk to the Honorable Philip S. Gutierrez in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. She also serves on the Board of Governors for the Women Lawyers’ Association of Los Angeles.