Overview
Rohit Nath leads some of the most consequential litigation in the country. He co-led the Susman Godfrey team that secured a court-approved $1.5 billion settlement for authors and publishers in Bartz v. Anthropic, the largest reported copyright settlement in history. In that case, he argued against Anthropic’s fair use defense at summary judgment, securing the decision that led to the $1.5 billion resolution.
Across his practice, Nath has helped recover more than $1 billion for plaintiffs and represented Fortune 500 companies in disputes involving billions of dollars. His work has earned recognition from Bloomberg Law, the Daily Journal, and The National Law Journal, including being named The Recorder’s 2026 Intellectual Property Attorney of the Year.
LANDMARK AI & TECHNOLOGY LITIGATION
In a historic copyright infringement action, Nath secured a court-approved $1.5 billion settlement for rightsholders whose books were downloaded by Anthropic from pirated databases. The settlement is the largest reported settlement in copyright history. Nath and his co-lead counsel were named Litigators of the Week by Law.com for this precedent-setting result. Nath argued successfully in opposition to Anthropic’s summary judgment motion on fair use, which paved the way for the settlement. Read more in the New York Times, Bloomberg, and Law.com.
Nath also represents prominent writers, including John Grisham, David Baldacci, Jonathan Franzen, Stacy Schiff, and Kai Bird, in copyright litigation against OpenAI and Microsoft. Read the Wall Street Journal’s coverage of the OpenAI case here. Nath was also tapped to serve as co-lead counsel in an AI copyright case against Apple.
In Doe v. Mindgeek, Nath represents a certified class of minors against against the parent company of Pornhub. He argued summary judgment on novel questions related to MindGeek’s Section 230 defense. The case settled, subject to court approval, for $120 million.
WINS FOR INSURANCE POLICYHOLDERS
Nath helped secure a $307.5 million deal for policyholders who challenged AXA life insurance rate increases targeting elderly insureds. The settlement came after nearly seven years of litigation, and after plaintiffs succeeded on class certification and defeated summary judgment.
In 37 Besen Parkway LLC v. John Hancock Life Insurance Co, Nath helped secure a settlement of $91.25 million (before fees and expenses) for a certified class of insurance policy owners against John Hancock Life Insurance Company. In the final approval order, Judge Paul Gardephe described the settlement as a “quite extraordinary . . . result achieved on behalf of the class.” You can read more about the case here (subscription required).
DEFENSE-SIDE LITIGATION
On the defense side, Nath has represented some of the largest companies in their biggest disputes. He previously defended Match Group in a nearly four-week jury trial arising from a multibillion-dollar dispute over the founding of Tinder. He also represented Chevron U.S.A. in a California property dispute that settled on confidential terms on the eve of trial.
PRO BONO
Nath previously received a Public Counsel Pro Bono award for his work defending the COVID-19 mortarium in the City of Los Angeles and other moratoria across the state. In Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles v. City of Los Angeles, Nath helped secure the first federal appellate decision upholding a COVID-19 eviction moratorium in the country.
The Daily Journal profiled Nath and his colleagues for their work in this area and named them a California Lawyer Attorney of the Year in 2023 for their critical work. Read more in the San Francisco Chronicle and Law360 (subscription required).
BACKGROUND
Nath joined Susman Godfrey after working as a trial attorney at the U.S. Department of Justice and a law clerk for Judge Alex Kozinski (Ret.) on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. He graduated with high honors from The University of Chicago Law School, where he served as editor-in-chief of The University of Chicago Law Review. Before law school, he taught eighth-grade math in Oklahoma as a Teach for America corps member. Nath is a longtime board member of the South Asian Bar Association of Southern California and served as co-president during the 2021-2022 term. He is also a member of the Executive Committee of the Litigation Section of the Los Angeles County Bar Association.
Notable Representations
- Bartz et al. v. Anthropic PBC (N.D. Cal) Secured a court-approved $1.5 billion settlement in a “historic” deal for rightsholders whose books were downloaded by Anthropic from the pirated databases “Library Genesis” and “Pirate Library Mirror.” This settlement is the largest publicly reported recovery in the history of U.S. copyright litigation. When preliminarily approving the settlement, Judge Alsup said, “We have some of the best lawyers in America in the courtroom right now.” Read more in Bloomberg and Law.com.
- In Re OpenAI Inc. Copyright Infringement Litigation (S.D.N.Y.) Represents a putative classes of book authors bringing copyright infringement claims against OpenAI and Microsoft. Class plaintiffs are best-selling authors who allege their books were illegally pirated and used to develop OpenAI and Microsoft’s Large Language Models, including the models used in ChatGPT.
- Hendrix et al. v. Apple Inc. (N.D. Cal) Tapped to serve as co-lead counsel to authors who allege that Apple used copyrighted books obtained from pirate libraries to train its Apple Intelligence AI models without permission or payment.
- Nazemian et al. v. NVIDIA Corporation (N.D. Cal) Represent a class of plaintiffs in a proposed class action alleging unlawful use of copyrighted works. Most recently, a California federal court denied in part NVIDIA’s motion to dismiss.
- In re: Mosaic LLM Litigation (N.D. Cal) Serve as counsel to plaintiffs in a proposed class action brought by authors who allege that Databricks and MosaicML copied their copyrighted books without permission to train large language models.
- Ted Entertainment, Inc. et al. v. Snap Inc., et al. (C.D. Cal., N.D. Cal.) Represent Ethan and Hila Klein’s Ted Entertainment against Snap, NVIDIA, ByteDance, and others in a putative class action related to defendants’ mass circumvention of YouTube’s technological protection measures.
- State of California, et al., On The Go Wireless, LLC, v. Cellco Partnership, et al. Served as trial counsel representing the largest political subdivisions in the largest state in the nation—including the University of California system, the California State University System, and the County of Los Angeles, to name a few—in this groundbreaking suit against Verizon, AT&T, and Sprint for over-billing the government. Nath helped secure settlements with all defendants collectively valued at $175 million, which have been paid to hundreds of California and Nevada government entities. These record-setting settlements are the largest of their kind in California.
- Rui Zhi Ventures, Ltd. v. Lighting Science Group Corporation (C.D. Cal. and JAMS Arbitration) Represented Lighting Science Group Corporation in a fee dispute with its former patent broker. After successfully compelling arbitration, the parties reached a confidential settlement on the eve of the plenary arbitration hearing.
- Bernstein, et al. v. Cengage Learning, Inc. (S.D.N.Y.) Represented authors of higher education textbooks for failure to pay royalties owed on their contracts when those texts were offered on the company’s online platforms. Secured a non-reversionary settlement of $21 million approved by the court for past damages.
- In re AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company COI Litigation (S.D.N.Y) Secured a $307.5 million deal for a putative class of plaintiffs who challenged AXA’s 2016 hike of cost on insurance rates on hundreds of elderly insureds, claiming AXA unfairly increased the cost of insurance for certain flexible-premium universal life insurance policies.
- Helen Hanks v. Voya Retirement Insurance and Annuity Company (S.D.N.Y.) Secured settlement worth $118 million, before fees and expenses, including a cash fund of over $92 million and an agreement by Voya not to impose a higher rate scale for 5 years, on behalf of a certified class of 46,000+ policyholders over allegations that Voya improperly raised cost-of-insurance charges.
- 37 Bensen Parkway v. John Hancock Life Insurance Company (S.D.N.Y) Secured a $91.25 million settlement all-cash, non-reversionary settlement (before fees and expenses) for insurance policy owners against John Hancock Life Insurance Company. The Honorable Paul Gardephe described the settlement as a “quite extraordinary . . . result achieved on behalf of the class.”
- Doe v. Mindgeek (C.D. Cal.) Represents a certified class of minors against the parent company of Pornhub. Nath successfully argued summary judgment on novel questions related to MindGeek’s Section 230 defense. The case settled, subject to court approval, for $120 million.
- Sony Pictures Television, et al. v. CBS Studios Inc., (L.A. Super. Ct.) Represented Sony in a lawsuit over CBS’s distribution of the iconic game shows Jeopardy! and Wheel of Fortune. Sony and CBS ultimately settled the dispute. Read more in the Wall Street Journal, The Hollywood Reporter, and Variety.
- Flo & Eddie Inc. v. Pandora (C.D. Cal.)Served as co-lead counsel representing Flo & Eddie (the founding members of 70’s music group, The Turtles) in a putative class action alleging infringement of the public performance right in sound recordings, copying, and misappropriation. This case followed the similar, Flo & Eddie v. Sirius XM, in which Susman Godfrey secured a settlement for the class valued at up to $73 million. The Court granted final approval of that settlement.
- Personalized Media Communications, LLC Cases (E.D. Tex.) Represented Personalized Media Communications (PMC) in a series of patent infringement cases against Vizio, Samsung, and Funai. Nath played a key role in these cases, which included taking and defending key depositions and briefing claim construction motions. PMC reached favorable, confidential settlements with each defendant.
- Four Batons v. Samsung (E.D. Tex.) Represented Four Batons Wireless LLC in a patent infringement case against Samsung. The case settled on confidential terms before trial.
Honors & Distinctions
Honors and Awards
AMERICAN LEGAL MEDIA
- Intellectual Property Attorney of the Year, The Recorder, The Recorder (2026)
- Litigator of the Week, Law.com (2025)
- Rising Stars of the Plaintiffs Bar, National Law Journal (2022)
- Sports and Entertainment Litigation Trailblazer, National Law Journal (2020)
BLOOMBERG LAW
DAILY JOURNAL
- Top Intellectual Property Lawyer, The Daily Journal (2025, 2026)
- California Lawyer Attorney of the Year (2023)
LAWDRAGON
- 500 Leading Litigator (2027)
- 500 Plaintiff Financial Lawyer (2026)
- 500X - The Next Generation of Leading Lawyers (2023, 2024, 2025, 2026)
OTHER
- Public Counsel Pro Bono Award (2020)
- Rising Star, Southern California (2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 Thomson Reuters)
Clerkships
- Honorable Alex Kozinski, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Education
Education
- The University of Chicago Law School (J.D., with High Honors, Order of the Coif, 2014)
- Editor-in-Chief, The University of Chicago Law Review
- Order of the Coif
- Kirkland & Ellis Scholar: Awarded to top 5 percent of the 1L class
- Wake Forest University (B.A., magna cum laude, 2009)
- 2011 Teacher of Today Award
- Wake Forest University Debate Team
Publications
- "Poisoning the WeLL(M): Pirated Data, Large Language Models, and Copyright," The Advocate, Texas State Bar Litigation Section, Winter 2024 Edition
- Corruption Clarified: Defining the Reach of “Agent” in 18 U.S.C. § 666, 80 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1391 (2013)
